Villanova vs. Creighton odds, line: 2021 faculty basketball picks, March 3 predictions from confirmed mannequin

[ad_1]

The Tenth-ranked Villanova Wildcats can clinch their seventh Large East common season title within the final eight seasons once they battle the No. 14 Creighton Bluejays on Wednesday night. With simply two video games remaining within the common season, the Wildcats (15-4 total, 10-3 in Large East) maintain a slim half-game cushion over the second-place Bluejays (17-6, 13-5). A victory on Wednesday would safe the convention title for Villanova, which has received at the very least a share of the title yearly because the 2013-14 season. However Creighton additionally controls its personal future and might win the title with victories over the Wildcats and Butler to shut the season. 

Tip-off is ready for 8:30 p.m. ET. The Wildcats are favored by 4.5-points within the newest Villanova vs. Creighton odds from William Hill Sportsbook, whereas the over-under for complete factors scored is 146.5. Earlier than making any Creighton vs. Villanova picks, remember to see the school basketball predictions and betting recommendation from SportsLine’s confirmed mannequin

The SportsLine Projection Mannequin simulates each Division I faculty basketball recreation 10,000 occasions. Over the previous four-plus years, the proprietary laptop mannequin has generated a powerful revenue of over $2,600 for $100 gamers on its top-rated faculty basketball picks towards the unfold. It has additionally returned over $500 on all top-rated faculty basketball picks this season. Anybody who has adopted it has seen enormous returns.

Now, the mannequin has set its sights on Villanova vs. Creighton. You may head to SportsLine to see its picks. Listed here are a number of faculty basketball odds and tendencies for Creighton vs. Villanova:

  • Villanova vs. Creighton unfold: Wildcats -4.5
  • Villanova vs. Creighton over-under: 146.5 factors
  • Villanova vs. Creighton cash line: Villanova -210, Creighton +175
  • NOVA: The Wildcats rank third within the nation in assist-to-turnover ratio (1.67)
  • CREI: Marcus Zegarowski leads crew in factors per recreation (14.9)

Newest Odds:

Villanova Wildcats
-4.5

Why Villanova can cowl 

Jermaine Samuels has enhanced his offensive recreation in the previous couple of weeks. The senior ahead from Franklin, Mass., has averaged 15.2 factors and 5.5 rebounds per recreation in his final six outings, whereas taking pictures 51.8 % from the sphere and hitting 12-of-20 makes an attempt from past the 3-point arc. Previous to his sizzling stretch, Samuels averaged 9.2 factors whereas taking pictures 46.0 % from the sphere and 30.8 % on 3-pointers.

As well as, Villanova is a a lot better crew at house than on the highway. Away from house, the Wildcats are 7-4 this season, taking pictures 43.5 % from the sphere and 33.4 % on 3-pointers. However at house they’re 8-0 and shoot 48.3 and 40.3 %, respectively.

Why Creighton can cowl

Marcus Zegarowski is having one other standout season for the Bluejays. The junior level guard from Hamilton, Mass., who was an honorable point out All-American final season, ranks eighth within the Large East in factors per recreation (14.9) and fourth in assists (4.6). He scored a season-high 25 factors the final time Creighton confronted Villanova.

As well as, the Bluejays have had the Wildcats’ quantity just lately. Creighton has received the final two conferences between the groups. That features an 86-70 blowout of then-No. 5 Villanova on Feb. 13.

Easy methods to make Creighton vs. Villanova picks

The mannequin is leaning over on the overall, projecting the groups mix for 154 factors. It additionally says one facet of the unfold hits over 50 % of the time. You may solely see the choose at SportsLine.

So who wins Villanova vs. Creighton? And which facet of the unfold hits over 50 % of the time? Go to SportsLine proper now to see which facet of the unfold you could leap on, all from the pc mannequin that has crushed its faculty basketball picks.

[ad_2]

supply

Leave a Reply